I. akArAnta puMlinga - The variation from akArAnta "rAma shabda" is in just three
places -
1. PrathamA vibhakti bahuvachana
rAma shabda - rAmAH
the sarvanAma shabdAs - sarve, vishve , eke (note when eka is used as bahuvachana,
the meaning is some people like some ones)
sarve vedA yatpadamAmananti
vishve devAH
vadanti iti eke (some say like this)
trayaH rAmAH santi - balarAma, parashurAma, raghurAma iti
2. ChaturthI vihakti ekA vachana -
sarvasmai namaH
vishvasmai namaH
ekasmai idam dadAmi
rAmAya namaH
3. saptamI vibhakti ekavachana -
vishvasmin itthaM bhavati |
sarvasmin deshe saMbhavati |
ekasmin kAle vartate |
rAme santi guNAssarve |
II.
AkArAnta strIlinga - The variation from AkArAnta "sItA shabda"
is in just one place
-
1.
saptamI vibhakti ekavachana -
sarvasyAH,
vishvasyAH, ekasyAH as against sItAyAM
III.
akArAnta napuMsakalinga - The variation from akArAnta "phala
shabda" is in just
two places -
1.
ChaturthI vihakti ekA vachana -
sarvasmai
phalAya prayatnaM karomi |
vishvasmai
phalAya kiM prayAsaH ?
ekasmai
phalAya idam kAryam |
phalAya
kimichChA ?
2.
saptamI vibhakti ekavachana -
vishvasmin
phale vA
sarvasmin
phale vA
ekasmin
phale vA
phale
vA
The question comes, whether sarvAH, vishvAH, ekAH, sarvAya, vishvAya, ekAya, sarve, vishve, eke are valid forms or not. These words can be used both as pronouns to describe ParamAtma or as proper nouns to describe ParamAtma. When the are used as proper nouns to describe ParamAtma, these forms are also valid and then they behave like RAma shabda. So, in essence both "sarvasmai namaH" and "sarvAya namaH" are valid expressions.

Comments
Post a Comment